2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of a discrete dish concentrator for uniform flux distribution on the cavity receiver of solar concentrator system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the flux distribution of the focal spot in the test plane are shown in Figure 4 through the simulation calculation with the OptisWorks software. The diameter of the spot is approximately 69.8 mm, which is highly consistent with the theoretical calculation result of Equation (9). The simulation results show that the total energy of the test plane is 3436 W, and the error is 0.09% compared with the theoretical results of Equation (11), and the two results are very close to each other.…”
Section: Methodology and Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the flux distribution of the focal spot in the test plane are shown in Figure 4 through the simulation calculation with the OptisWorks software. The diameter of the spot is approximately 69.8 mm, which is highly consistent with the theoretical calculation result of Equation (9). The simulation results show that the total energy of the test plane is 3436 W, and the error is 0.09% compared with the theoretical results of Equation (11), and the two results are very close to each other.…”
Section: Methodology and Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Chong et al [7,8] proposed a nonimaging planar concentrator and a design method to obtain a uniform flux distribution on a planar receiver. Yan et al [9] proposed a mirror rearranging method for a parabolic dish concentrator and a novel discrete dish concentrator [10], which significantly improved the flux uniformity of the cavity receiver. Evangelos et al [11] proposed cylindrical, rectangular, spherical, conical, and cylindrical-conical receivers, and the research shows that the cylindrical-conical receiver has the best flux uniformity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, by solving Equations (16) and (17) at the same time using the Newton-Raphson Method [37], and having the same number of the equations and unknown parameters, amounts of the . Q net, n , and T s,n for each element are determined.…”
Section: Methods To Determine the Optimum Structure Of Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research has numerically and experimentally investigated cavity receivers as the solar absorber in solar concentrators. Yan et al [17] optimized a cylindrical cavity receiver as the solar receiver of a dish concentrator. They presented a new type of dish concentrator as the solar concentrator with some discrete mirrors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing the optical and the thermal performance of the parabolic trough concentrator is highly important and a concern of several studies. Some of the notable approaches to address these problems created by the nonuniform distribution of solar flux are as follows: integration of inner helical fins into the tube, increased surface roughness and integration of helical swirl generators into the absorber tube, unilateral milt‐longitudinal vortexes enhanced parabolic trough reflector, injection of metal foams into the absorber pipe, replacement of a steel absorber pipe with a copper thermal receiver, a copper and steel bimetallic absorber, and cavity absorber . All of these studies have concentrated on improving the heat transfer between the working fluid and the thermal receiver or replacement of absorber tube with a better one with enhanced thermal properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%