2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of a lumbar interspinous fixation device for the lumbar spine with degenerative disc disease

Abstract: Interspinous spacer devices used in interspinous fixation surgery remove soft tissues in the lumbar spine, such as ligaments and muscles and may cause degenerative diseases in adjacent segments its stiffness is higher than that of the lumbar spine. Therefore, this study aimed to structurally and kinematically optimize a lumbar interspinous fixation device (LIFD) using a full lumbar finite element model that allows for minimally invasive surgery, after which the normal behavior of the lumbar spine is not affect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gazzeri reported, "The ISP analyses increase the risk of fracture of the spiny process". The prosthesis avoids Comparing the results with those of other researchers that have used the FEM to visualize the behavior of various ISP [32,[50][51][52][53][54], it is concluded that the results are satisfactory since, in these studies, the maximum forces are generated in the prosthesis and the deformations are reduced. Therefore, the prostheses end up providing excellent stability to the spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gazzeri reported, "The ISP analyses increase the risk of fracture of the spiny process". The prosthesis avoids Comparing the results with those of other researchers that have used the FEM to visualize the behavior of various ISP [32,[50][51][52][53][54], it is concluded that the results are satisfactory since, in these studies, the maximum forces are generated in the prosthesis and the deformations are reduced. Therefore, the prostheses end up providing excellent stability to the spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The model's validation was performed considering the behavior of the FEM model in relaxed standing without the ISP versus the loads and ROMs used by other researchers. In the literature, the forces employed in experiments and simulations vary from 220 N to 1200 N [32,[50][51][52][53]. The displacements coincide with other research [54].…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For the developed FSU, RoM was 5.17 • in flexion, 1.54 • in extension, 3.36 • in lateral bending, and 1.14 • in axial rotation. The present study was compared with previous in vivo studies [80][81][82][83], then it was compared with a mean of all FE studies, as well as the results of six other FE studies [69,74,[84][85][86][87], as combinedly reported by Dreischarf et al, 2014 [70,88]. It must be highlighted here that, despite the slight variation in RoM from the earlier published data, the median of all the data was taken for comparison of our results.…”
Section: Validation Of Fsu-fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%