16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-3824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of a Seamless Inlet Liner Using an Empirically Validated Prediction Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, for the BPF case considered, the m = 22 circumferential mode should receive increased weighting (since, again, the fan has 22 blades). This is further illustrated in the work by Schuster,10 in which source modal decomposition shows the m = 21 through m = 24 circumferential modes to be dominant. The presence of the additional circumferential modes may be a result of Tyler-Sofrin type interactions a between the m = 22 mode and the single probe mounted in the nacelle (as seen in the figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, for the BPF case considered, the m = 22 circumferential mode should receive increased weighting (since, again, the fan has 22 blades). This is further illustrated in the work by Schuster,10 in which source modal decomposition shows the m = 21 through m = 24 circumferential modes to be dominant. The presence of the additional circumferential modes may be a result of Tyler-Sofrin type interactions a between the m = 22 mode and the single probe mounted in the nacelle (as seen in the figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The Mach number profiles were the result of iterative calculations in which the source plane Mach number was adjusted to approximate Mach number values used in the aforementioned seamless liner optimization effort. 10 As presented in figure 4, this translated to source plane Mach number values of M = 0.38 and M = 0.60 for 54% and 87% N1C, respectively. It should be noted that these Mach number profile approximations affect source and in-duct acoustic content and are a source of uncertainty in the prediction inputs.…”
Section: Prediction Code Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In conjunction with this trend, a number of fan noise prediction assessments have provided valuable insights into improved fan noise propagation/radiation prediction with limited fan source information. 1,2,3 Advanced manufacturing techniques have also opened new possibilities for the practical implementation of broadband liner concepts. 4 With these observations in mind, a broadband acoustic liner optimization study for a benchmark scale model fan is pursued.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%