2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0156-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of amorphadiene production in engineered yeast by response surface methodology

Abstract: Isoprenoids are among the most diverse bioactive compounds synthesized by biological systems. The superiority of these compounds has expanded their utility from pharmaceutical to fragrances, including biofuel industries. In the present study, an engineered yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae (YCF-AD1) was optimized for production of Amorpha-4, 11-diene, a precursor of anti-malarial drug using response surface methodology. The effect of four critical parameters such as KH2PO4, methionine, pH and temperature w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adjusted R 2 value was 0.9877. The adjusted R 2 value corrects the R 2 value for the sample size and for the number of terms in the model (Baadhe et al, 2014). That value of the adjusted R 2 is also good, supporting the significance of this developed model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The adjusted R 2 value was 0.9877. The adjusted R 2 value corrects the R 2 value for the sample size and for the number of terms in the model (Baadhe et al, 2014). That value of the adjusted R 2 is also good, supporting the significance of this developed model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Correlation coefficient (R 2 ) value equals 0.9981 which implies that the model equation could explain 99.81% of the total variation which suggested a good agreement between predicated values and experimental data. R 2 is the coefficient of variance of response under test and whose values are always between 0 and 1; closer the value of R 2 to 1, the stronger is the statistical model and better is the prediction (Baadhe et al, 2014). The adjusted R 2 value was 0.9877.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Values of R 2 are from 0 to 1; when R 2 value comes near to 1, it reflects stronger statistical model and better prediction (Uma and Satyanarayana 2003; Baadhe et al . 2014). Here, the model coefficient of determination R 2 equals 0·9859, the adjusted R 2 equals 0·9772, and the predicted R 2 equals 0·9533, which indicated the high model correlation with the experimental values and fitness of model, and supported the model significance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCTR3 repressed by cheap CuSO4 was slight better to suppress ERG9 expression to reduce FPP flux to squalene than PMET3 repressed by methionine (Paddon et al , 2013, Peng et al , 2017. To achieve high sesquiterpene, fermentation process needs to be optimized via such as response surface methodology (Baadhe et al , 2014) and feeding various carbon sources. Feedback-controlled ethanol pulse feed has several significant advantages over restricted glucose feed.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%