2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of an effective extraction procedure for the analysis of microcystins in soils and lake sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each experiment, samples were taken 3 times a week and lyophilized by frozen vacuum drier. 2 g of the dried soil sample was extracted with 0.1 M EDTA e 0.1 M Na 4 P 2 O 7 e 0.1% TFA and ultrasonicated (400 W, 10 min) (Chen et al, 2006), the resulting suspensions were centrifuged at 4000 Â g for 8 min, and the residues were extracted for two times. For each sample, the three supernatants were applied to preconditioned Sep-pak ODS cartridges and the eluted methanol solutions were reduced to 1ml under nitrogen flow, and then analyzed using an HPLC.…”
Section: Persistence Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each experiment, samples were taken 3 times a week and lyophilized by frozen vacuum drier. 2 g of the dried soil sample was extracted with 0.1 M EDTA e 0.1 M Na 4 P 2 O 7 e 0.1% TFA and ultrasonicated (400 W, 10 min) (Chen et al, 2006), the resulting suspensions were centrifuged at 4000 Â g for 8 min, and the residues were extracted for two times. For each sample, the three supernatants were applied to preconditioned Sep-pak ODS cartridges and the eluted methanol solutions were reduced to 1ml under nitrogen flow, and then analyzed using an HPLC.…”
Section: Persistence Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…doi:10.1016/j.aca.2011.10.027 [11,15,17] and 0.1 M EDTA-0.1 M Na 4 P 2 O 7 [18]. However, a single solvent extraction is not considered sufficient for accurate quantification of many MCs in sediment samples owing to the lack of standard materials and inconsistent extraction efficiency, which could be strongly affected by both the type of sediments and the structure of MC variants [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous results reported that mixtures of methanol and water extracted more efficiently compared to extraction with methanol and water, respectively [14], and acidified methanol led to the higher microcystins yields, since hydrophobic character of microcystins improves as the pH value decreases [15]. Wei et al [16] shows that microcystin-LR yield in acidified methanol was twice that obtained in methanol alone. Similar results also obtained in the present study.…”
Section: A Extraction Of Microcystins With Different Solvent Combinamentioning
confidence: 98%