2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2012.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of an extracellular zinc-metalloprotease (SVP2) expression in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated by our work ( [15,16] and this article), and the work of others [14,29,30] that besides the expression host, the most important factors affecting soluble protein expression are the post-induction temperature and the duration of induction, especially since these two variables often interact [14]. (Table 8, run 10) and it was approximately 3 times higher than the lowest expression level (5.6 mg/L) obtained using the combination BL21(DE3)/30 o C/20 h (Table 8, [16].…”
Section: Optimization Of Soluble Protein Expression Using a Fractionasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It has been demonstrated by our work ( [15,16] and this article), and the work of others [14,29,30] that besides the expression host, the most important factors affecting soluble protein expression are the post-induction temperature and the duration of induction, especially since these two variables often interact [14]. (Table 8, run 10) and it was approximately 3 times higher than the lowest expression level (5.6 mg/L) obtained using the combination BL21(DE3)/30 o C/20 h (Table 8, [16].…”
Section: Optimization Of Soluble Protein Expression Using a Fractionasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, improving the production rate and simplifying the purification procedure are important. The E. coli expression system is a widely used expression platform because of its advantages of short growth cycle, low cost and high yield [23]. In this study, bioactive FIP-nha production in E. coli reached 42.7 mg/L, which was two times higher than the result of Bastiaan-Net et al in 2013 [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Compared with other expression platforms, the E. coli expression system is a useful benchmark because of its advantages, such as short growth cycle and low cost [25]. Although there are some disadvantages using E. coli as the expression host for production of recombinant protein for research and clinical applicaton, e.g., post-translational modifications, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination, yet because FIP-fve is a pure protein with a molecular weight of 12.7 kDa and without carbohydrate [2], it could be produced in E. coli.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complicated technology and high cost, the yield of natural FIP-fve was very low (87.5–165 mg/kg) [2,24], thus, selecting a suitable expression system is the premise of the application of FIP-fve. While the FIP-fve expressed in insect cells can also induce the expression of IL-2 of mouse spleen cells [24], yet it’s yield was low (6 mg/L) [25]. Meanwhile, recombinant GST- FIP-fve from E. coli with the yield (5 mg/L) only has 50% activity of natural FIP-fve [2,11], whereas we get 29.1 mg recombinant FIP-fve from 1L culture of E. coli Transetta (DE3), and the obtained His-FIP-fve increased the secretion of IL-2 and IFN-γ at suitable concentrations, which correlated with the findings of Wang P.H.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%