2022 Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/elconrus54750.2022.9755529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of an Inertial Sensor De-Noising Method using a Hybrid Deep Learning Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method achieved good signal enhancement results on the training set, but the signal enhancement results on the test data were unsatisfactory. Further, Boronakhin et al (Boronakhin et al 2022) used Bayesian optimization to optimize the hyperparameters of the GRU-LSTM model, which improved the model performance on the test set, but due to the lack of interpretability of deep learning models, the generated signal has poor trustworthiness and even loses the semantic information of the input signals (Shamwell et al 2019). Even though the generated signals were better than the input signals in some quantization indicators (such as quantization noise, angle random walk, velocity random walk, and bias instability), they performed worse than the original signals in downstream tasks such as attitude estimation and trajectory reconstruction (Huang et al 2019).…”
Section: Data-driven Methods For Imu Signal Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This method achieved good signal enhancement results on the training set, but the signal enhancement results on the test data were unsatisfactory. Further, Boronakhin et al (Boronakhin et al 2022) used Bayesian optimization to optimize the hyperparameters of the GRU-LSTM model, which improved the model performance on the test set, but due to the lack of interpretability of deep learning models, the generated signal has poor trustworthiness and even loses the semantic information of the input signals (Shamwell et al 2019). Even though the generated signals were better than the input signals in some quantization indicators (such as quantization noise, angle random walk, velocity random walk, and bias instability), they performed worse than the original signals in downstream tasks such as attitude estimation and trajectory reconstruction (Huang et al 2019).…”
Section: Data-driven Methods For Imu Signal Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 98%