2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3101400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of an Oleo-Pneumatic Shock Absorber for Main Landing Gear of a Commercial Aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the oleo strut, in comparison to alternative landing gears, offers a weight-to-vertical energy dissipation advantage. It consists of a gas chamber producing pneumatic force and features a sharpedged orifice with a conical metering pin structure, including stroke-dependent damping force [2][3][4]. However, achieving high performance under various landing scenarios becomes challenging as the shapes of the orifice and metering pin are predetermined during the design stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the oleo strut, in comparison to alternative landing gears, offers a weight-to-vertical energy dissipation advantage. It consists of a gas chamber producing pneumatic force and features a sharpedged orifice with a conical metering pin structure, including stroke-dependent damping force [2][3][4]. However, achieving high performance under various landing scenarios becomes challenging as the shapes of the orifice and metering pin are predetermined during the design stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landing performance of an aircraft is primarily determined by the landing efficiency, which describes the energy dissipation characteristics of the landing gear (Chartier et al, 2006;Miku1owski and Holnicki-Szulc, 2003: 63-72). In the case of passive landing gear such as the oleo-pneumatic type, the landing performance can be optimized by changing the shape of the metering pin and sharp-edge orifice, depending on the descent rate and strokes of the shock absorber (Li et al, 2017(Li et al, : 1689(Li et al, -1694Patel et al, 2017). Both Roskam and Currey proposed a formula for the shock stroke of the shock absorber, based on aircraft landing efficiency (Daniel, 2011: 861-867;Heerens, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%