2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13051205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Artificial Intelligence System by Evolutionary Algorithm for Prediction of Axial Capacity of Rectangular Concrete Filled Steel Tubes under Compression

Abstract: Concrete filled steel tubes (CFSTs) show advantageous applications in the field of construction, especially for a high axial load capacity. The challenge in using such structure lies in the selection of many parameters constituting CFST, which necessitates defining complex relationships between the components and the corresponding properties. The axial capacity (P u ) of CFST is among the most important mechanical properties. In this study, the possibility of using a feedforward neural network (FNN) to predict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Validation performance is a critical step in a modeling procedure, for which several statistical indices has been suggested and used [13,14,[49][50][51][52]. In this study, we used Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) [39,[53][54][55][56], Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64], Kappa, Accuracy (ACC), Specificity (SPF), Sensitivity (SST), Negative predictive value (NPV), and Positive predictive value (PPV) [65][66][67][68][69]. Detail description of these indices is presented in published literature [61,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77].…”
Section: Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation performance is a critical step in a modeling procedure, for which several statistical indices has been suggested and used [13,14,[49][50][51][52]. In this study, we used Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) [39,[53][54][55][56], Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64], Kappa, Accuracy (ACC), Specificity (SPF), Sensitivity (SST), Negative predictive value (NPV), and Positive predictive value (PPV) [65][66][67][68][69]. Detail description of these indices is presented in published literature [61,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77].…”
Section: Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precisely, the R values allow the statistical relationship between experimental results to be identified, and ML to predict the USC [147,148] by yielding a value between 0 and 1, where 0 is no correlation and 1 is a total correlation. In the cases of RMSE and MAE, which have the same units as the quantity being estimated [24,42], lower values of RMSE and MAE indicate a basically good accuracy of the prediction output using the ML models [149][150][151][152][153][154]. The values of R, RMSE, and MAE are estimated using the following equations [107,108,115,147]:…”
Section: Machine Learning Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, various popular quantitative statistical indexes, namely mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and correlation coefficient (R) were used to validate and compare the performance of different machine learning models. A detailed description of these indices is presented in previously published works [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Their calculation can be carried out by using the following Equations (2)–(4) [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]: where : actual output, : predicted output, : mean of the and k: number of samples.…”
Section: Machine Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%