2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2014.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of biodiesel production from the waste cooking oil using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The recorded over all percentage weight loss with in biodiesel degradation temperature range from 120°C to 330°C for the optimum biodiesel prepared sample (Figure 8b) was 96.5% compared with 60% weight loss for the biodiesel prepared sample at the high reactant flow rate of 200 mL/h (Figure 8c). Moreover, it was indicated from Figure 8c that the biodiesel sample prepared at high reactant flow rates poses around 30% weight losses within the oil degradation temperature range, explained as unreacted oil [23]. These results confirm the successful biodiesel production in pure state at the optimum preparation conditions in contrast to biodiesel prepared at high reactant flow rates that contains remaining unreacted oil.…”
Section: Characterization Of Produced Biodieselsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The recorded over all percentage weight loss with in biodiesel degradation temperature range from 120°C to 330°C for the optimum biodiesel prepared sample (Figure 8b) was 96.5% compared with 60% weight loss for the biodiesel prepared sample at the high reactant flow rate of 200 mL/h (Figure 8c). Moreover, it was indicated from Figure 8c that the biodiesel sample prepared at high reactant flow rates poses around 30% weight losses within the oil degradation temperature range, explained as unreacted oil [23]. These results confirm the successful biodiesel production in pure state at the optimum preparation conditions in contrast to biodiesel prepared at high reactant flow rates that contains remaining unreacted oil.…”
Section: Characterization Of Produced Biodieselsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…%). The variable ranges that are provided in Table 1 were adopted to cover the intervals that commonly are utilized in literature [25][26][27][28][29]. Once the inputs and levels have been set as in Table 1, the design matrix and their corresponding combination of operating conditions are generated using the Statistical Software R (R Development Core Team, Auckland, New Zealand) [30].…”
Section: Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major impediment to the full commercialization of biodiesel is the high cost of production. Thus, one way of reducing this cost is through the use of inexpensive raw materials such as WCO (Hamze et al, 2015). From the environmental point of view, the use of WCO reduces the disposal problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transesterification, also known as alcoholysis, involves the formation of glycerol and esters through the reaction of alcohol with either oil or fat. The reaction type and temperature, type of alcohol, agitation speed, concentration of catalyst, water content, alcohol to oil molar ratio, and FFA of the feedstock are the core process factors that usually influence the transesterification process (Hamze et al, 2015). Compared with conventional heating, the applications of microwave irradiation in biodiesel production have led to a considerable reduction in the reaction time and an increase in the biodiesel yield (Motasemi & Ani, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%