2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of biogas-reforming conditions considering carbon formation, hydrogen production, and energy efficiencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the insensitivity of biogas reforming performance to pressure variations, the analysis was performed under ideal gas conditions, deliberately ignoring the effect of pressure on thermodynamic properties. 31…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the insensitivity of biogas reforming performance to pressure variations, the analysis was performed under ideal gas conditions, deliberately ignoring the effect of pressure on thermodynamic properties. 31…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feed H 2 O/(CH 4 + CO + CO 2 ) ratio was intentionally fixed at 2.0 to avoid coke formation. ,, The gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of the gas mixture was maintained at 315,282 h –1 for catalyst screening over a range of temperatures. The gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) was calculated by eq . , GHSV .25em ( h 1 ) = feed .25em gas .25em flow .25em rate .25em ( mL / h ) catalyst .25em bed .25em volume .25em ( mL ) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning steam addition, high S/C ratios (at least 1.5, achieving excess of feed vapor) are recommended to avoid coke deposition, among other factors like high pressure [100,118]. However, from an economic point of view, the production of large quantities of superheated vapor would imply a considerable increase in costs [42].…”
Section: Operating Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%