IEEE MILCOM 2004. Military Communications Conference, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2004.1494980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of building material properties for accurate indoor ray tracing models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique sets a threshold value to decrease the computational time and reduce the usage of the memory resources. Three-dimensional ray-tracing algorithm has been proposed in [4] to reduce the computational time by using the utilizing the electromagnetic engine at the expense of the geometric engine. Similar technique has been proposed in [5] but with an offline electromagnetic field calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique sets a threshold value to decrease the computational time and reduce the usage of the memory resources. Three-dimensional ray-tracing algorithm has been proposed in [4] to reduce the computational time by using the utilizing the electromagnetic engine at the expense of the geometric engine. Similar technique has been proposed in [5] but with an offline electromagnetic field calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these results, it is clear that the proposed model can precisely reproduce the power distribution in both scenarios, even with very general wall properties being used. These wall properties can be further optimised using techniques in [29], [30] to improve accuracy.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are very few publications addressing the deterministic modeling calibration issue. In [10], measurements with 200 MHz bandwidth centered at 1 GHz have been conducted and a separate tuning of the dielectric permittivity of each building wall has been performed, without considering the loss tangent. The authors presented a comparison between their model and the measurements for path loss parameters.…”
Section: Towards Improving the Modeling Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%