2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of cortical hierarchies with continuous scales and ranges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9. Here, a spatial representation of an average hierarchy (Reid et al, 2009) derived from the sorting of areas by laminar projection patterns (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991; Hilgetag et al, 2000c) (Fig. 9A) is compared with the structural types of these areas (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. Here, a spatial representation of an average hierarchy (Reid et al, 2009) derived from the sorting of areas by laminar projection patterns (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991; Hilgetag et al, 2000c) (Fig. 9A) is compared with the structural types of these areas (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, hierarchically modular network topology has been shown to exist in a wide range of biological networks (Ravasz, 2009;Reid et al, 2009) as well as information processing systems like the human brain and complex computer circuits that have been cost-efficiently embedded into physical space .…”
Section: Conserved Topological Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "mosaic organization" of the cortex into specialized regions that become functionally integrated during perception and cognition (Zeki, 1978;Zeki and Shipp, 1988), as well as the idea that large-scale connectivity in the primate brain is structurally (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991) and functionally (Mesulam, 1998) organized into multiple processing streams and forms a hierarchy. More recently, the arrival of quantitative network modeling and analysis Bullmore and Sporns, 2009) has provided welldefined, internally consistent, and methodologically flexible tools with which to characterize and report hierarchy (Reid et al, 2009), informational efficiency (Achard and Bullmore, 2007), small-world connectivity (Sporns and Zwi, 2004;, modularity (Chen et al, 2008;Meunier et al, 2009), and hub structure (Hagmann et al, 2008;Buckner et al, 2009) in brain network data. Topological analyses of brain network have been carried out on MR imaging data as well as on electrophysiological Note the presence of dense pathways between the medial frontal cortex and the PCC as well as lateral parietal cortex, as well as the relative absence of connections between the lateral parietal cortex and the precuneus (see also Van den Heuvel et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Network Topology Of Sc and Fcmentioning
confidence: 99%