IEEE GLOBECOM 2007-2007 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 2007
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2007.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of CPM Pragmatic Capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in the case of the MSK modulation, the choice F = 1.2, based on the 99% of the signal power, provides a spectral efficiency dramatically lower than the choice F = 0.55. This fact confutes various previous works as [5], [6], [16], where the search for spectrally efficient schemes was carried out without exploiting the above mentioned tradeoff between AIR and ASE. An optimization algorithm able to exploit it is presented in the next section.…”
Section: Ultimate Performance Limitssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, in the case of the MSK modulation, the choice F = 1.2, based on the 99% of the signal power, provides a spectral efficiency dramatically lower than the choice F = 0.55. This fact confutes various previous works as [5], [6], [16], where the search for spectrally efficient schemes was carried out without exploiting the above mentioned tradeoff between AIR and ASE. An optimization algorithm able to exploit it is presented in the next section.…”
Section: Ultimate Performance Limitssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…An interesting conclusion, confirmed by other simulation results not reported here, is that, once all the other parameters are set, modulations based on a REC frequency pulse always outperform the corresponding modulations based on a RC frequency pulse. This fact was unexpected, since it is widely believed that the RC frequency pulses provide better spectral properties [1], [5], [6], [10], [11], and is discussed later. In Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations