2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of cross-section of actively bent grid shells with strength and geometric compatibility constraints

Abstract: Optimization of cross-section of actively bent grid shells with strength and geometric compatibility constraints, Computers and Structures, 154 (2015) 163-176.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such complex shapes are also conceivable with selfshaping. However, in this context, the programming of self-shaping gridshells by numerical analysis will need to be integrated in application-based form-finding procedures that are traditionally used for standard design of gridshell geometry under service loading conditions [51][52][53][54][55][56]. Especially, the minimizing of overall strain energy, here induced by the self-shaping, and with it the additional contributions of in-plane bending moments identified above, might be relevant for form-finding design [57].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such complex shapes are also conceivable with selfshaping. However, in this context, the programming of self-shaping gridshells by numerical analysis will need to be integrated in application-based form-finding procedures that are traditionally used for standard design of gridshell geometry under service loading conditions [51][52][53][54][55][56]. Especially, the minimizing of overall strain energy, here induced by the self-shaping, and with it the additional contributions of in-plane bending moments identified above, might be relevant for form-finding design [57].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following references have been included in this category: Li and Knippers, 29 D'Amico et al, 30 D'Amico et al 31 and Senatore and Piker. 32 They base on previous work by Williams thoroughly explained in Adriaenssens.…”
Section: Finite-element Discretizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple test is provided in here to assess the accuracy of the 3 Dof formulation in comparison to a co-rotational beam-element with 6 DoF (described in [48]): A 10 m long cantilever beam is subjected to a vertical loadP = 1 kN at its free end. Table 1.…”
Section: Cantilever Beammentioning
confidence: 99%