2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of deep learning model for coastal chlorophyll a dynamic forecast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another LSTM was used to identify the most reliable Chl a proxy for predicting changes in algal biomass. Wenxiang et al (2022) found that the change rate and the relative change rate of Chl a were more accurate outputs for predicting the changes in biomass than the absolute concentration of Chl a , especially in winter and spring. Indeed, the correlation coefficient indicating the relationship between the forecasted and the observed concentration of Chl a exceeds 0.84 for all‐year‐round predictions when using the change rate and the relative change rate of Chl a , while it dropped below 0.6 when using the absolute concentration of Chl in winter and spring.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Plankton Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another LSTM was used to identify the most reliable Chl a proxy for predicting changes in algal biomass. Wenxiang et al (2022) found that the change rate and the relative change rate of Chl a were more accurate outputs for predicting the changes in biomass than the absolute concentration of Chl a , especially in winter and spring. Indeed, the correlation coefficient indicating the relationship between the forecasted and the observed concentration of Chl a exceeds 0.84 for all‐year‐round predictions when using the change rate and the relative change rate of Chl a , while it dropped below 0.6 when using the absolute concentration of Chl in winter and spring.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Plankton Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional water quality monitoring method based on field investigation, remote sensing technology has the advantages of a low cost, wide range and high efficiency. With the development of highresolution and multi-source satellite sensors, the retrieval of water-environment-related elements using remote sensing has been widely applied in the monitoring of water quality and hydro-environmental pollution in large areas of water [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%