2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of design variables and control rules in field development under uncertainty: A case of intelligent wells and CO2 water alternating gas injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several distinct methods of CO 2 flooding. The huff and puff process [19,20], the CO 2 foam injection [21,22], and the water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection [16,[23][24][25] method are among the most well known. The latter approach is based on alternating periods of continuous water and gas injection through one group of wells and the oil extraction through another group of wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several distinct methods of CO 2 flooding. The huff and puff process [19,20], the CO 2 foam injection [21,22], and the water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection [16,[23][24][25] method are among the most well known. The latter approach is based on alternating periods of continuous water and gas injection through one group of wells and the oil extraction through another group of wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of WAG can be compromised by low E v and E a due to the gravity override and channeling that causes an early breakthrough of injected gas to the producing wells [6,15,22,28,29]. Thus, E v and E a are mainly controlled by the reservoir heterogeneity and the wells spacing [25,30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%