2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iesm.2015.7380169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of dynamic operating theatre facility layout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the layout will be rearranged in a way that it satisfies the patient demands of each period. Table 1 summarizes the differences between the robust approach of Chraibi et al [4] and our adaptive approach. Traditional FLP approaches consider a planning horizon generally divided into periods of weeks, months or years.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, the layout will be rearranged in a way that it satisfies the patient demands of each period. Table 1 summarizes the differences between the robust approach of Chraibi et al [4] and our adaptive approach. Traditional FLP approaches consider a planning horizon generally divided into periods of weeks, months or years.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of our MAS approach, this paper will focus on the AOTLP and present just the adopted architecture and novelties compared to the developed MILP for the problem in Ref. [4]. The developed MILP aims to minimize the traveling costs for the considered entities (doctors, patients, and medical and non-medical staff) for each period in the planning horizon, to maximize the adjacency rating between dependent facilities and to minimize rearrangement costs generated by moving appropriated equipment for each room specialty [Eq.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to [67], this is because the global competitive environment has changed from being between individual firms to a relationship between supply chains. Moreover, organizations are in constant pursuit of efficient supply chains and/or networks, which guarantee competitive advantages in the global economic market [43]. For these reasons, it is necessary for organizations to manage not only their own internal relations, but also their relationships with other organizations within the SC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, effective SCM leads to the amelioration of product quality and customer service. It also leads to better market responsiveness, access to the target market, and hence improves organizational performance overall [e.g., 43,52,59]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%