“…However, the rate of the degradation of chlorophyll ‘a’ and ‘b’ pigments and the synthesis of lycopene and β-carotene were recorded to be significantly ( p < 0.05) higher for the uncoated fruits, followed by the tomatoes coated with formulations 1 (10 g L −1 AS, 0 mL L −1 EO, 5 g L −1 BW), 2 (10 g L −1 AS, 2.5 mL L −1 EO, 5 g L −1 BW), and 3 (10 g L −1 AS, 5 mL L −1 EO, 5 g L −1 BW), implying their elevated ripening as a function of a higher respiration rate and metabolic activity, as discussed by Naeem et al 40 Nevertheless, the tomatoes coated with formulations 6 (15 g L −1 AS, 5 mL L −1 EO, 5 g L −1 BW), 8 (20 g L −1 AS, 2.5 mL L −1 EO, 5 g L −1 BW), and 9 (20 g L −1 AS, 5 mL L −1 EO, 5 g L −1 BW) exhibited significantly ( p < 0.05) delayed rates of production and breakdown of the pigments, which is attributed to the restricted maturation process during storage. 71 Javanmardi et al 79 reported that the temperature range and respiration rate are the major factors that affect the synthesis of lycopene in tomatoes during storage. Furthermore, significantly ( p < 0.05) delayed rates of production and breakdown of pigments in the fruits with formulations 6, 8, and 9 could also be explained by the effects of clove EOs.…”