2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.08.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
368
0
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 673 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
28
368
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Antioxidant power, measured by DPPH free-radical scavenging potential, showed a decreasing trend with increasing temperature, which might be due to the occurrence of well known degradative phenomena (Casazza et al, 2012). Our results are in accordance with those of studies by Cacace and Mazza (2003a), Liyanapathirana and Shahidi (2005), and Pinelo et al (2005), in which the polyphenol yield increased with increasing temperature. However, some flavonoid families are thermosensitive (Cacace and Mazza, 2003a).…”
Section: Effects Of Temperature On Eap Eaf and Antioxidant Potentialsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Antioxidant power, measured by DPPH free-radical scavenging potential, showed a decreasing trend with increasing temperature, which might be due to the occurrence of well known degradative phenomena (Casazza et al, 2012). Our results are in accordance with those of studies by Cacace and Mazza (2003a), Liyanapathirana and Shahidi (2005), and Pinelo et al (2005), in which the polyphenol yield increased with increasing temperature. However, some flavonoid families are thermosensitive (Cacace and Mazza, 2003a).…”
Section: Effects Of Temperature On Eap Eaf and Antioxidant Potentialsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…RSM is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques that has been successfully used to evaluate the effects of several process variables and their interactions [Liyana-Pathirana and Shahidi 2005]. In single-factor experiments for the recovery of 6-gingerol, proper ranges of ratio of liquid to solid (10:1, 15:1, 20:1, 25:1, 30:1, 35:1, mL·g -1 ), ethanol proportion (50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100% v/v), microwave power (200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 W), extraction time (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 s) were determined.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water was used to the evaluation of the allelopathic activity, and the acid-ethanol extraction was made in order to quantify the allelochemicals, with subsequent partitioning with ethyl acetate, resulting in a semi-purified fraction. Since the solubility of the phenolic compounds is partly controlled by the polarity of the solvent, there is an influence of the solvent in the efficiency of the extraction, thus reflecting in a greater or lesser recovery of the phenolic compounds (Liyana-Pathirana and Shahidi, 2005), with the possibility of loss of those compounds depending on the type of extraction (Naczk and Shahidi, 2004). The aqueous extraction simulates the conditions of leaching by rain water, however, the ethanol extraction is more effective to obtain secondary metabolites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%