2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of gaseous fuel injection for saving energy consumption and improving imbalance of heat distribution in iron ore sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system of differential equations presented by Eqs. (1)- (8) are completed with their initial and boundary conditions listed in Table 1. Ignition was realized by hot coke oven gas combustion flue gas with velocity of 4.0 m/s and temperature of 1 400 K from the ignition burner, and the duration of ignition is 90 s. Then air was sucked into the sintering bed layer with the average velocity of 0.43 m/s.…”
Section: Boundary and Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system of differential equations presented by Eqs. (1)- (8) are completed with their initial and boundary conditions listed in Table 1. Ignition was realized by hot coke oven gas combustion flue gas with velocity of 4.0 m/s and temperature of 1 400 K from the ignition burner, and the duration of ignition is 90 s. Then air was sucked into the sintering bed layer with the average velocity of 0.43 m/s.…”
Section: Boundary and Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5) The results showed that COG injection can increase the content of calcium ferrite in sinter and improve the quality of sinter, and it has also a positive effect for energy saving. Cheng [6][7][8] studied the substitution of coke fines with charcoal combined with gas fuel injection under laboratory conditions, and the study showed that under the proper proportion of charcoal and gas fuel, the temperature field of the sinter layer can be optimized without reducing the productivity of the sintering, so as to improve the product quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the NO x , SO x , dust, and dioxins generated from sintering are about 50% of the total emissions of iron and steel enterprises, it is important to understand these in order to develop new energy-saving and environment-protecting sintering technologies for reducing pollution emissions. Although new technologies for reducing NO x emissions, such as biomass fuel [1], fuel gas injection [2], and flue gas recirculation [3,4], have been applied in some sintering plants, there is even greater 2 of 21 potential for investigating the mechanism of NO x production and reduction. NO x emission can be affected by fuel properties and operation conditions during the iron ore sintering process [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, SO 2 and NOx emissions during sintering account for 60% and 50% of the overall emissions of SO 2 and NOx in steel production, respectively [1]. At present, new technologies for reducing NOx emission during sintering mainly include flue gas recirculation sintering (FGRS), selective catalytic reduction [2], biomass fuel [3][4][5][6], gas injection [7], and parameter control [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%