2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2012.08.618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of genomic DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genomic DNA of the six cultivars was isolated from leaves using standard Cetyl Trimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) methods (Lodhi et al, 1994 ). Five micro gramstotal gDNA was sheared to a fragment size of ~600 bp with a Covaris ultrasonicator (Aubakirova et al, 2012 ) and Illumina-ready sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq-DNA library preparation kit, following the manufacturer's recommended procedures. WGS sequences were collected on an Illumina HiSeq2500 using a 2 × 125 bp paired-end module.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic DNA of the six cultivars was isolated from leaves using standard Cetyl Trimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) methods (Lodhi et al, 1994 ). Five micro gramstotal gDNA was sheared to a fragment size of ~600 bp with a Covaris ultrasonicator (Aubakirova et al, 2012 ) and Illumina-ready sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq-DNA library preparation kit, following the manufacturer's recommended procedures. WGS sequences were collected on an Illumina HiSeq2500 using a 2 × 125 bp paired-end module.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%