2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-015-0066-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of hot water extraction and ultra high pressure extraction for deer antler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These extraction conditions led to recovery of higher yield (39.29%), uronic acid content (22.68 mg/g), and sialic acid content (0.73 mg/g). Similar results have been reported by Jin et al (2015) regarding hot water extraction of bioactive compounds from middle parts of deer antlers originated from New Zealand. Hot water extraction showed comparable extract yield (6.72%) and sialic and uronic acids contents were 0.11 mg/g and 0.75 mg/g of solid Optimal conditions for HE were 90℃ for 20 h with a solvent ratio of 1:29.34.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 90%
“…These extraction conditions led to recovery of higher yield (39.29%), uronic acid content (22.68 mg/g), and sialic acid content (0.73 mg/g). Similar results have been reported by Jin et al (2015) regarding hot water extraction of bioactive compounds from middle parts of deer antlers originated from New Zealand. Hot water extraction showed comparable extract yield (6.72%) and sialic and uronic acids contents were 0.11 mg/g and 0.75 mg/g of solid Optimal conditions for HE were 90℃ for 20 h with a solvent ratio of 1:29.34.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hence, optimized HWE led to increased recovery of sialic acid from VA extract owing to increased mass transfer during the extraction process. Similar results have been reported about ultra-high pressure extraction (UHPE) of sialic acid and solvent ratio was the most significant factor for maximum recovery of sialic acid; thus, UHPE proved to be more efficient economically compared to traditional extraction methods [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The independent variables were extraction temperatures (80, 85, 90, 95, and 100°C) and time intervals (12,18,24,30, and 36 h). The dependent variables were expressed as extraction yield (%) and sialic acid content (mg/g) [15]. All the experimental runs were performed under CCD configurations and the results were used for multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments were carried out 11 running including three replications of the center point (80°C, 30 min). These CCD of experiments referenced the extract conditions of puffed ginseng (time and pressure), (Lee et al 2014) and deer antler (time, temperature, and solvent ratio), (Jin et al 2015 (Ilaiyaraja et al 2015). The results are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%