Assistive technology use is associated with reduced capability poverty: a crosssectional study in Bangladesh.Borg, Johan; Östergren, Per-Olof; Larsson, Stig; Rahman, Asm Atiqur; Bari, Nazmul; Khan, Ahm Noman Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Borg, J., Östergren, P-O., Larsson, S., Rahman, A. A., Bari, N., & Khan, A. N. (2012). Assistive technology use is associated with reduced capability poverty: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 7(2), 112-121. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2011.602173 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Focusing on the ends rather than the economic means of human development, the capability approach offers an alternative view of poverty. The purpose was to explore the relation between assistive technology use and capability poverty in a low-income country.Method: Self-reported data on food intake, health care, education, politics, self-determination, selfrespect, family relationships and friendships were collected in Bangladesh through interviews of people with hearing impairments using and not using hearings aids, and people with ambulatory impairments using and not using manual wheelchairs (N=583). Differences in outcomes between users and non-users of assistive technology were analyzed using logistic regression.Results: Assistive technology users were more likely than non-users to report enhanced capabilities, hearing aid users to a larger extent than wheelchair users. Synergistic effects between assistive technology use and education were found.
Conclusion:The use of assistive technology is predictive of reduced capability poverty in Bangladesh. Lack of wheelchair accessibility and the nature of selected outcomes may explain the limited association in the ambulatory group. Enhancing the effects of the other, there is support for providing education in combination with hearing aids.2