2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11094-021-02527-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of HPLC Method Using Central Composite Design for the Estimation of Escitalopram and L-Methyl Folate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimization of the analytical method was conducted employing an FCCD, capable of dealing with the quadratic polynomials, to deduce the main effect as well as the effect due to interactions. A two‐factor FCCD has already been widely documented to be an efficient and economical experimental design for further response surface optimization studies, owing to its distinctly superior capability to detect any nonlinearity and interaction effects in the factor–response relationship(s), and requirement of minimal outlay of experimental effort and time during method development (Kumar et al, 2021; Singh et al, 2010; Singh, Beg, & Raza, 2013; Singh, Singh, et al, 2013). ygoodbreak=β0goodbreak+β10.25emX1goodbreak+β20.25emX2goodbreak+β30.25emX10.25emX2goodbreak+β40.25emX12goodbreak+β50.25emX22, where the coefficient β 0 indicates the intercept term, the polynomial coefficients β 1 and β 2 represent the coefficients of corresponding linear model terms, β 3 signifies the coefficient term for factor interaction(s), and the coefficients β 4 and β 5 represent the respective quadratic model terms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optimization of the analytical method was conducted employing an FCCD, capable of dealing with the quadratic polynomials, to deduce the main effect as well as the effect due to interactions. A two‐factor FCCD has already been widely documented to be an efficient and economical experimental design for further response surface optimization studies, owing to its distinctly superior capability to detect any nonlinearity and interaction effects in the factor–response relationship(s), and requirement of minimal outlay of experimental effort and time during method development (Kumar et al, 2021; Singh et al, 2010; Singh, Beg, & Raza, 2013; Singh, Singh, et al, 2013). ygoodbreak=β0goodbreak+β10.25emX1goodbreak+β20.25emX2goodbreak+β30.25emX10.25emX2goodbreak+β40.25emX12goodbreak+β50.25emX22, where the coefficient β 0 indicates the intercept term, the polynomial coefficients β 1 and β 2 represent the coefficients of corresponding linear model terms, β 3 signifies the coefficient term for factor interaction(s), and the coefficients β 4 and β 5 represent the respective quadratic model terms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of the analytical method was conducted employing an FCCD, capable of dealing with the quadratic polynomials, to deduce the main effect as well as the effect due to interactions. A two-factor FCCD has already been widely documented to be an efficient and economical experimental design for further response surface optimization studies, owing to its distinctly superior capability to detect any nonlinearity and interaction effects in the factor-response relationship(s), and requirement of minimal outlay of experimental effort and time during method development (Kumar et al, 2021;Singh et al, 2010;Singh, Beg, & Raza, 2013;.…”
Section: Response Surface Optimization Of the Developed Analytical Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%