2023
DOI: 10.1002/pc.27249
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of interfacial bonding properties between thermoplastic liners and carbon fiber‐reinforced composites by atmospheric‐pressure plasma and failure mechanism study

Abstract: Weak interfacial bonding properties between thermoplastic liners and carbon fiber‐reinforced composites (CFRP) can easily lead to debonding failure, which is a major challenge in development of type IV composite hydrogen storage vessels. We optimized Box–Behnken design atmospheric‐pressure plasma process parameters for maximizing interfacial bonding properties between thermoplastic liner (PA11 liner) and CFRP using Design‐Expert software. From various designs, plasma process parameters, including time (t), noz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the surface treatment of carbon fiber composites includes surface chemical modification, removal of the surface weak boundary layer, improved wetting of the low-energy surface, and increased surface roughness, which can enlarge the bondable surface area or improve the mechanical interlocking. , Surface chemical modification can be achieved by grafting multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) onto a carbon fiber surface using silane coupling agent as carrier . Removal of the surface weak boundary layer can be achieved through UV or picosecond laser cleaning. , Improving the wetting of low-energy surface and increasing the surface roughness of carbon fiber composites can be achieved through mechanical methods (such as manual hand sanding, grit blasting, and peel-ply plus grit blasting) , and energetic techniques, such as plasma treatment , and laser processing. , Among them, the mechanical method had the advantage of low cost, but its flexibility, adjustability, efficiency, and precision were relatively low. Plasma treatment has the advantage of relatively high efficiency and precision, but it needs a special atmosphere environment and inorganic or organic masks; the treatment effect is time-sensitive; the treatment process is relatively complex, and not flexible enough; and the equipment is generally expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the surface treatment of carbon fiber composites includes surface chemical modification, removal of the surface weak boundary layer, improved wetting of the low-energy surface, and increased surface roughness, which can enlarge the bondable surface area or improve the mechanical interlocking. , Surface chemical modification can be achieved by grafting multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) onto a carbon fiber surface using silane coupling agent as carrier . Removal of the surface weak boundary layer can be achieved through UV or picosecond laser cleaning. , Improving the wetting of low-energy surface and increasing the surface roughness of carbon fiber composites can be achieved through mechanical methods (such as manual hand sanding, grit blasting, and peel-ply plus grit blasting) , and energetic techniques, such as plasma treatment , and laser processing. , Among them, the mechanical method had the advantage of low cost, but its flexibility, adjustability, efficiency, and precision were relatively low. Plasma treatment has the advantage of relatively high efficiency and precision, but it needs a special atmosphere environment and inorganic or organic masks; the treatment effect is time-sensitive; the treatment process is relatively complex, and not flexible enough; and the equipment is generally expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22] There is a large literature on plasma modification of composites, but most of the research is aimed at improving the interface between reinforcement and matrix, [23][24][25][26] and a few studies focus on the adhesive bonding enhancement between composite components. Qi et al 27 optimized the atmospheric-pressure plasma parameters for maximizing interfacial bonding properties between thermoplastic liner and CFRP to avoid debonding failure. The optimum process parameters including time, nozzleto-specimen distance and gas flow rate were found by measuring the climbing drum peel strength, the flatwise tensile strength and the strain energy release rate of the treated samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 With its high strength and low density, CFRP has been widely applied for aviation, 7-9 automobile 10,11 and pressure vessels fields. 12,13 The specific strength of CFRP can reach 1147.4 kNÁm/kg, 3 while that of conventional 45# steel is about 45.5 kNÁm/kg. If hydraulic cylinders are manufactured with CFRP, the hydraulic cylinder weight would be significantly reduced, which would enhance the aircraft's performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With its high strength and low density, CFRP has been widely applied for aviation, 7–9 automobile 10,11 and pressure vessels fields 12,13 . The specific strength of CFRP can reach 1147.4 kN·m/kg, 3 while that of conventional 45# steel is about 45.5 kN·m/kg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%