2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-06920-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of internal burnishing operation for energy efficiency, machined quality, and noise emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar impacts of the tangential speed (cutting speed) on the energy efficiency can be found in the milling, 27 turning, 28 and burnishing operations. 29 Supplementary Figure 6b indicated that a higher linear speed increases energy efficiency. When the linear speed relatively changes from 4 mm/min to 8 mm/min, the energy efficiency is relatively decreased by 22.2%.…”
Section: Parametric Influencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar impacts of the tangential speed (cutting speed) on the energy efficiency can be found in the milling, 27 turning, 28 and burnishing operations. 29 Supplementary Figure 6b indicated that a higher linear speed increases energy efficiency. When the linear speed relatively changes from 4 mm/min to 8 mm/min, the energy efficiency is relatively decreased by 22.2%.…”
Section: Parametric Influencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Higher energy efficiency with increased honing depth (machining depth) can be found for the milling, 27 turning, 28 and burnishing operations. 29 The main influences of process parameters on the surface roughness are shown in Supplementary Figure 7.…”
Section: Parametric Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors stated that improvements in the power factor, EB, and Ra were 22.0%, 49.5%, and 13.8%, respectively. The ANFIS approach was applied to present the correlations between process parameters (S, f, BD, and N) and the burnishing outputs (energy efficiency, machining noise, and Ra) [13]. The optimal values presented that the reductions in the energy efficiency, machining noise, and Ra were 6.98%, 25.0%, and 2.23%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AR, cylindricity (CL), and circularity (CC) were saved by 55.0%, 80.0%, and 2.0% at the optimal S, f, and D for the burnished hardened steel [7]. The ANFIS models of the energy efficiency and machining noise were developed regarding the S, f, D, and the number of rollers for internal burnished SCr440 steel [8]. The authors stated that the energy efficiency and machining noise were saved by 7.0% and 2.2% at the optimality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%