1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.360083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of island size in single electron tunneling devices: Experiment and theory

Abstract: We have investigated the influence of island size on the operation of single electron tunneling (SET) devices. The self-heating, self-capacitance, and charge noise have been determined for six SET transistors with island sizes varying from 0.17×0.17 μm2 to 5×5 μm2. The I–V characteristics of these devices can be well fit to a model where the heat flow from the device is limited by the electron-phonon coupling. The best fit to this model was obtained with an electron-phonon coupling parameter of Σ=0.3×109 W K−5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter α has been obtained from the dc transport measurements for a device with essentially same geometry and fabrication process, and has been found to be α = (1.3 × 10 −3 e) 2 . This value is consistent with what was reported in other works [43][44][45], and also with the value derived from T 2 . Figure 6 summarizes the reduced noise spectrum S E derived from the measured 1 according to Eq.…”
Section: Energy Relaxationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameter α has been obtained from the dc transport measurements for a device with essentially same geometry and fabrication process, and has been found to be α = (1.3 × 10 −3 e) 2 . This value is consistent with what was reported in other works [43][44][45], and also with the value derived from T 2 . Figure 6 summarizes the reduced noise spectrum S E derived from the measured 1 according to Eq.…”
Section: Energy Relaxationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…1/ f charge noise is very common in single-electron devices and is usually attributed to random motion of charges either in the substrate or the junction barrier, although the exact mechanism is still not known [43][44][45]. Indeed, the sample studied here also showed 1/ f noise when the dc current through the probe junction was measured.…”
Section: Free-induction Decay and Charge Echomentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Roukes et al 41 Cu 2 × 10 9 Cu-on-sapphire 125 Nahum and Martinis 42 Cu 3.7 × 10 9 Verbrugh et al 43 Al 0.2 to 0.5 × 10 9 Al-on-Si 100 Covington et al 44 AuPd 1.4 × 10 9…”
Section: A Thermal Time Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The barrier dielectric has been proposed as location of the charge traps by several groups. 14,19,22,26 Several groups have shown that the low-frequency noise at the output of the SET varies with the current gain ͑‫ץ‬I / ‫ץ‬Q g ͒ of the SET and that the maximum noise is found at the bias point with maximum gain. [20][21][22] This indicates that the noise sources acts at the input of the device, i.e., as an external fluctuating charge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there have been many efforts 14,15,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] to reveal the physical origin of the background charge fluctuators, the nature of these fluctuators is still unknown. It is not even clear where these fluctuators are located.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%