2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2017.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of laboratory illumination in optical dating

Abstract: As part of the development of new laboratory lighting, we present a methodological approach applicable to the characterization of any light source intended for illumination in optical dating laboratories. We derive optical absorption cross-sections for quartz and feldspar from published data and compare these with the human eye response. The optimum peak wavelength giving the best clarity of non-dark adapted vision for the least trapped charge loss lies within the wavelength range 590 to 630 nm; we argue that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were processed at the Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating, Roskilde, Denmark, under subdued orange light (Sohbati et al. 2017). For luminescence measurements, 9–18 cores (as many as possible depending on the size of each cobble) of ~10 mm in diameter and ~10–30 mm long were drilled from each cobble using a diamond‐tipped, water‐cooled coring drill, and then cut at intervals of ~1.5 mm using a low‐speed, water‐cooled wafering saw, equipped with a 0.3‐mm‐thick diamond‐tipped blade.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were processed at the Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating, Roskilde, Denmark, under subdued orange light (Sohbati et al. 2017). For luminescence measurements, 9–18 cores (as many as possible depending on the size of each cobble) of ~10 mm in diameter and ~10–30 mm long were drilled from each cobble using a diamond‐tipped, water‐cooled coring drill, and then cut at intervals of ~1.5 mm using a low‐speed, water‐cooled wafering saw, equipped with a 0.3‐mm‐thick diamond‐tipped blade.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One block was further cut into ~3 × 5 × 1 cm slabs (Fig. 5), perpendicular to its original surface (by aligning the flat glacially polished exposed surface at 90° with the cutting blade), using a large water-cooled diamond saw under subdued orange light 66 . One of these slabs was used directly (without polishing) for the HR-IRPL measurements reported here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary sample preparation took place in Moscow under orange LED lights (Sohbati et al . 2017). After disaggregating and wet‐sieving, the resulting fine and medium sand fractions (90–250 μm) were treated with 10% HCl, then 10% H 2 O 2 , and finally 10% HF, before the samples were transferred to the Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating at Risø, Denmark.…”
Section: Sampling Laboratory Sample Preparation and Instrumental Facmentioning
confidence: 99%