2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00778-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of loading conditions for tube hydroforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with (F,G,H) are the parameters characterizing the current state of anisotropy If the circumferential direction is taken as a material reference, the anisotropy effect can be characterized by a single coefficient R [17] and the equation (1) becomes:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with (F,G,H) are the parameters characterizing the current state of anisotropy If the circumferential direction is taken as a material reference, the anisotropy effect can be characterized by a single coefficient R [17] and the equation (1) becomes:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest studies are devoted to the mechanical and numerical modelling of the hydroforming processes using the finite element analysis [6][7][8][9][10], allowing the prediction of the material flow and optimisation of hydroforming parameters [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In addition, the accuracy of the numerical a Corresponding author: bouchaib.radi@yahoo.fr prediction remains linked to the fidelity models representing the behaviour of the WT and particularly the mechanical properties (plasticity metal flow, anisotropy effect and damage initiation and growth) of the base metal (BM) and the welded joint (WJ) zone [20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due especially to the former advantage, iterative algorithms are quite often applied to optimise metal forming processes, see, e.g. Byon and Hwang (2001), Cao et al (2001), Debray et al (2004), Duan and Sheppard (2002), Endelt and Nielsen (2001); Endelt (2003), Fann and Hsiao (2003), Jirathearanat and Altan (2004), Kim et al (2001a, b), Kleinermann (2001), Kleinermann and Ponthot (2003), Lin et al (2002Lin et al ( , 2003, Naceur et al (2001Naceur et al ( , 2004c, Ponthot and Kleinermann (2005), Shi et al (2004), Sillekens and Werkhoven (2001), Yang et al (2001), Zhao et al (2004).…”
Section: Solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ben Ayed et al (2004aAyed et al ( , b, 2005, Breitkopf et al (2005), Cao et al (2001), Debray et al (2004), Jansson (2002), Jansson et al 2005, Kim et al (2001a, Kleinermann (2001), Kleinermann and Ponthot (2003), Lenoir and Boudeau (2003), Liew et al (2004), Naceur et al (2001Naceur et al ( , 2003Naceur et al ( , 2004a, Ponthot and Kleinermann (2005), Schenk and Hillmann (2004), Sheng et al (2004), Shi et al (2004), Lin et al (2002) and Strano and Carrino (2004) apply optimisation techniques to deep drawing; Abedrabbo et al (2004), Aydemir et al (2005), Di Lorenzo et al (2004), Endelt (2003), Endelt and Nielsen (2001), Fann and Hsiao (2003), Jirathearanat and Altan (2004), Johnson et al (2004), Labergère and Gelin (2004a, b), Ray and Mac Donald (2004), Sillekens and Werkhoven (2001), Weyler et al (2004) and Yang et al (2001) to hydroforming; Carrino et al (2003a, b) and Kim et al (2001b) to superplastic forming; Byon and Hwang (2001) and Lin et al (2003) to extrusion; and António et al (2004)...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of optimizing a T-shape, Fann et.al [11], found an optimum relationship between internal pressure and axial feeding applied in a hydroforming process. To do this, they utilized FEA method and conjugate gradient optimization algorithm simultaneously by setting a computer software to attain an optimized geometry and thickness distribution.Aydemir et.al [12], developed an adaptive design method for T-shape tube parts based on FEM to avoid wrinkling and necking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%