2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2006.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of mono- and anti-symmetrical I-sections of cold-formed thin-walled beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15,16,18]). It is shown that optimising the crosssectional geometry of simply-supported CFS beams subjected to uniformly distributed vertical [10,12,13] or transverse load [14] can substantially improve their flexural capacity. However, due to cross-sectional shape restrictions in size optimisation methods, the efficiency of the optimised sections may drop slightly from self-shape optimisation solutions [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15,16,18]). It is shown that optimising the crosssectional geometry of simply-supported CFS beams subjected to uniformly distributed vertical [10,12,13] or transverse load [14] can substantially improve their flexural capacity. However, due to cross-sectional shape restrictions in size optimisation methods, the efficiency of the optimised sections may drop slightly from self-shape optimisation solutions [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the strengthening (the increase of the critical load) of anti-symmetric lipped beams may be observed (Table 1). Experimental investigations of anti-symmetric non-lipped (without lips) I-section beams are presented in [12]. The critical load of lipped beams is about 25% higher than non-lipped beams.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the design variables in sizing optimisation are the dimensions of a predetermined shape [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], the vector of design variables in shape optimisation represents the boundary of the structural domain [13][14][15][16][17]. A major challenge in shape optimisation is the large number of design variables and constraints that need to be taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%