2015 IEEE 17th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, 2015 IEEE 7th International Symposium 2015
DOI: 10.1109/hpcc-css-icess.2015.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Network Bandwidth Allocation in Xen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, I-Share dynamically adjusts the time slice according to the disk status for each VM to fairly allocate bandwidth. The dynamic network bandwidth allocation technique [60], [61] provides fair network performance through the allocation of the virtual interface function (VIF), which is a network virtualization unit of the virtualized system. These technologies configure network performance metrics for network-intensive VMs and monitor the related real-time network I/O information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, I-Share dynamically adjusts the time slice according to the disk status for each VM to fairly allocate bandwidth. The dynamic network bandwidth allocation technique [60], [61] provides fair network performance through the allocation of the virtual interface function (VIF), which is a network virtualization unit of the virtualized system. These technologies configure network performance metrics for network-intensive VMs and monitor the related real-time network I/O information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BOOST mechanism improves the I/O performance of the VM; however, the BOOST priority causes the multi-BOOST problem, which arises from I/O performance imbalance due to multiple vCPUs having the same boost priority. Further, a scheduling policy based on round-robin scheduling limits I/O improvement of the Credit1 scheduler [10,16,19,20].…”
Section: Credit1 Schedulermentioning
confidence: 99%