2010
DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-3-75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of odour-baited resting boxes for sampling malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis Patton, in arid and highland areas of Africa

Abstract: BackgroundOdour baited resting boxes are simple, reliable and important tools for sampling malaria vector mosquitoes in surveillance and control programmes in different parts of Africa. To optimize the use of cow urine baited resting boxes for sampling An. arabiensis, a community-based study was conducted in Mabogini hamlet in the Lower Moshi irrigation scheme area.MethodExperimental designs using 3 by 3 Latin square were conducted for twenty days to evaluate the following: i) the effect of different parameter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Belleville traps were structurally better but were not useful as the methods evaluated in this study due to their lower ability to estimate the productivity in habitats with deep water, higher grass cover, water turbidity, algal abundance and debris cover which could not affect current methods [40]. The reported methods in this study are more reliable in estimating vectors population in an area of interest for vector intervention than other methods such as human landing catch, pyrethrum spray catch, pit trap, and odour-baited traps [21,41-43]. The failure of the above mentioned methods in estimating local vector densities seasonally is based on the fact that they estimate only adult densities that might have flown from other locations for host-seeking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belleville traps were structurally better but were not useful as the methods evaluated in this study due to their lower ability to estimate the productivity in habitats with deep water, higher grass cover, water turbidity, algal abundance and debris cover which could not affect current methods [40]. The reported methods in this study are more reliable in estimating vectors population in an area of interest for vector intervention than other methods such as human landing catch, pyrethrum spray catch, pit trap, and odour-baited traps [21,41-43]. The failure of the above mentioned methods in estimating local vector densities seasonally is based on the fact that they estimate only adult densities that might have flown from other locations for host-seeking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This area is known to have high mosquito densities mostly throughout the year compared to other areas [23]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study area is described in detail elsewhere by Kweka et al [23,29]. The experiments were carried out in two seasons: during the dry season (January to February) and the rainy season (mid March to May).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%