We thank Giorgakis and colleagues for their interest in our recent published article.1,2 Since the etiology of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) in Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) for Liver Transplantation (LT) is not well defined, hypotheses include ischemia-reperfusion injury, microvascular thrombosis, cytotoxic injury, and impaired biliary epithelial regeneration, 3-5 adopting a multifaceted protocol to optimize perioperative conditions is essential. We concur with their observation that fast organ recovery with rapid decompression, in-situ aortic and portal flushing, biliary tree flushing-and in our institution, retrograde venous flushing-keep short ischemic times, careful donorrecipient selection, and pristine technical implantation are imperative to good outcomes.As we mentioned in our paper, we acknowledge the limitations of our retrospective non-randomized study. In the setting of multiple simultaneous changes in our protocol, we cannot, and we do not assume that our graft and patient survival rates are exclusively related to the use of tPA. However, our report shows the safety of tPA utilization after portal reperfusion with no adverse events and no increase in transfusion requirements. Additionally, the early success of this DCD protocol led us to liberalize our thresholds for DCD donor age, hepatic steatosis, and ischemia times with >60% of our last 100 DCD livers originated outside our donor service area and 10% received a donor with functional warm ischemia time (fWIT) >30 minutes.As Giorgakis et al comment, short ischemia times are important in DCD LT and fWIT seem to play an essential role. In our late DCD group, only one patient with fWIT >30 minutes, fWIT of 45 minutes, developed IC indicating that not all factors are mitigated by our protocol. It is worth mentioning that although concept of fWIT is clear to the transplant community, there is a lack of consensus on the level of oxygen saturation and/or systolic blood pressure used to define its beginning.While our institution, 2,6 King's, 7 and others 8,9 report outcomes in DCD LT comparable to Donation after Brain Death (DBD), DCD LT is still not perfect. In our report, the incidence of IC and hepatic artery thrombosis in late DCD group was significant high than in DBD group (3 vs. 0.5%, P < .05). Therefore, efforts should continue to investigate and improve DCD LT outcomes.We look forward to learning more from our colleagues across the Atlantic and propose a faculty exchange to variations in technique.
DISCLOSUREThe authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation.
Keywordsclinical research/practice, donors and donation: donation after circulatory death (DCD), liver allograft function/dysfunction, liver transplantation/hepatology, organ procurement