2004
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2004.825185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Permanent Magnet Shape for Minimum Cogging Torque Using a Genetic Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods to reduce the cogging torque have been proposed in recent years. For instance, employing the auxiliary slots [1], [3], [4]- [9], shaping the rotor magnets or stator teeth [10]- [13]. Another effective method for reducing cogging torque is skewing [1], [3], [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods to reduce the cogging torque have been proposed in recent years. For instance, employing the auxiliary slots [1], [3], [4]- [9], shaping the rotor magnets or stator teeth [10]- [13]. Another effective method for reducing cogging torque is skewing [1], [3], [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization variables are the dimensions of the magnet and rotor core. We use two optimization approaches: the Kriging model based on Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) and a genetic algorithm (GA) [12][13][14][15]. The optimal results from the optimization algorithm are verified with 3D-finite element analysis (FEA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods, such as a fractional number of slots per pole [3], [4], slot skewing [5,6] magnet skewing [7,8] auxiliary slots or teeth [3], magnet segmentation [9], pole-arc optimization [3], magnet displacing and shaping [10], etc. have been proposed to reduce the cogging torque [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%