2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of power density and metal-to-adsorbent weight ratio in coated adsorbers for adsorptive heat transformation applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Δ( T middle – T low ) should be comparable large to Δ( T high – T middle ) in order to allow the production of cold at higher back‐cooling temperatures, thus allowing a broader temperature‐range where materials can be used. While optimized prototype low temperature ADCs utilizing silica gels or salt loaded silica gels have SCPs between 78 and 230 W kg Ads −1 , most recently reported ADCs containing TiAPSO, SAPO‐34,[5c,18] or MIL‐53‐FUM coated HXs exhibited mean powers, SCPs and VSCPs in the same value range as observed for CAU‐10‐H but at higher driving temperatures of 90 °C (Table S5, Supporting Information). As demonstrated here, the strength of CAU‐10‐H for the use in cooling applications are its low desorption temperature (70 °C) at large Δ( T middle – T low ) and small Δ( T high – T middle ) values.…”
Section: Measurement Details Of Cau‐10‐h Coated Hxmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Δ( T middle – T low ) should be comparable large to Δ( T high – T middle ) in order to allow the production of cold at higher back‐cooling temperatures, thus allowing a broader temperature‐range where materials can be used. While optimized prototype low temperature ADCs utilizing silica gels or salt loaded silica gels have SCPs between 78 and 230 W kg Ads −1 , most recently reported ADCs containing TiAPSO, SAPO‐34,[5c,18] or MIL‐53‐FUM coated HXs exhibited mean powers, SCPs and VSCPs in the same value range as observed for CAU‐10‐H but at higher driving temperatures of 90 °C (Table S5, Supporting Information). As demonstrated here, the strength of CAU‐10‐H for the use in cooling applications are its low desorption temperature (70 °C) at large Δ( T middle – T low ) and small Δ( T high – T middle ) values.…”
Section: Measurement Details Of Cau‐10‐h Coated Hxmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Only few results on full‐scale HX using SAPOs and MOFs have been reported so far. [5c,6,15] A quantitative comparison of these systems is hard to draw due to the differences in desorption and adsorption conditions as well as measurement methods. The most important parameters to take into account are the temperature levels T high / T middle / T low , respectively the temperature difference Δ( T high – T middle ) and Δ( T middle – T low ).…”
Section: Measurement Details Of Cau‐10‐h Coated Hxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of adsorbent material loaded inside the HX was much lower than that of the packed bed because the coating thickness of 0.12 mm maximizes the heat and mass transfer efficiency, thus achieving a specific power as high as possible. Figure 5 shows a series of the flat tube-fin HXs coated with TiAPSO SCT-323 from Clariant AG, Bitterfeld, with binder SILRES MP 50 E from Wacker Chemie AG [33]. The HX without coating and flanges had a weight of 0.465 kg and was completely made of aluminum.…”
Section: Flat Tube-fin-coatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass of the HTF (water) inside the flat tubes was 0.1 kg, and in the headers and the additional tubes was 0.15 kg. Figure 5 shows a series of the flat tube-fin HXs coated with TiAPSO SCT-323 from Clariant AG, Bitterfeld, with binder SILRES MP 50 E from Wacker Chemie AG [33]. The HX without coating and flanges had a weight of 0.465 kg and was completely made of aluminum.…”
Section: Flat Tube-fin-coatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent developments have shown that better performances are obtained when the adsorbing solid is shaped as a coating covering the heat exchanger surfaces. A coating has several advantages compared to the loose powder because the interface contact is improved and the quantity of porous material needed is optimized as well as the mechanical and thermal stability of the adsorber module [27,28]. Several different solutions have been proposed, like the direct synthesis of the adsorbing material on the heat exchanger surfaces [29,30] or the use of binders and ligands to make coatings [23,31] or the use of metallic or polymeric fibres or foams [32][33][34][35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%