1996
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00909-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of preparative ion-exchange chromatography of proteins: linear gradient separations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, this model has been widely used to describe protein adsorption equilibrium. These reported results demonstrated the efficacy of the SMA model in predicting the nonlinear adsorption behavior of multicomponent protein in step gradient (Chen et al, 2003b), linear gradient (Gallant et al, 1996;Jakobssona et al, 2005) and displacement ion-exchange systems (Natarajan et al, 2000) as well as metal affinity systems (Vunnum et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, this model has been widely used to describe protein adsorption equilibrium. These reported results demonstrated the efficacy of the SMA model in predicting the nonlinear adsorption behavior of multicomponent protein in step gradient (Chen et al, 2003b), linear gradient (Gallant et al, 1996;Jakobssona et al, 2005) and displacement ion-exchange systems (Natarajan et al, 2000) as well as metal affinity systems (Vunnum et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In their study, the values of and a of BSA in pH 7.8 Tris-HCl buffer were 4.3 and 142, respectively. Gallant et al (1996) reported that the values of K a , and a for adsorption of lysozyme onto a strong cation exchange column (SCX) (sulfopropyl, 54 × 5 mm I.D.) with a column capacity of 525 mmol/l in pH 6.0 phosphate buffer were 0.211, 6.14 and 0, respectively.…”
Section: Parametric Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that case, total time taken for loading can be calculated as Productivity in that case will be defined as Optimization. To accomplish any optimization in preparative chromatographic systems, one needs to consider four different factors: objective function, parameters, decision variables and constraints (17). Optimization consists of maximizing or minimizing a given objective function.…”
Section: In These Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luo and Hsu (15) used an iterative scheme to optimize the gradient slope in linear ion-exchange chromatography. In addition, iterative optimization schemes have been used for optimizing step gradient (16), linear gradient (17) and displacement systems (18). Suwondo et al (19) employed a generalized reduced gradient method to maximize throughput in ideal linear chromatography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%