2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Process Parameters in Plasma arc Cutting of EN 31 Steel Based on MRR and Multiple Roughness Characteristics Using Grey Relational Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to satisfy these requirements, the corresponding NTM process, work material, shape feature and sub-shape feature are accordingly selected in Figure 12. For the PAM process, based on an extensive survey of the existing literature (Xu et al, 2002;Das et al, 2014;Adalarasan et al, 2015;Ramakrishnan et al, 2018), arc voltage, cutting current, cutting speed, feed rate, torch stand-off distance, plasma gas pressure and pierce height are identified as the predominant control parameters influencing its machining performance. On the other hand, the important responses are shortlisted as conicity, chamfer, dross, heat affected zone (HAZ), kerf width, MRR and SR. Now, in Figure 13, the end user preselects arc voltage, cutting current, feed rate and torch stand-off distance as the available PAM process parameters, and chamfer, dross, kerf width and SR as the desired responses.…”
Section: Example 3: Plasma Arc Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to satisfy these requirements, the corresponding NTM process, work material, shape feature and sub-shape feature are accordingly selected in Figure 12. For the PAM process, based on an extensive survey of the existing literature (Xu et al, 2002;Das et al, 2014;Adalarasan et al, 2015;Ramakrishnan et al, 2018), arc voltage, cutting current, cutting speed, feed rate, torch stand-off distance, plasma gas pressure and pierce height are identified as the predominant control parameters influencing its machining performance. On the other hand, the important responses are shortlisted as conicity, chamfer, dross, heat affected zone (HAZ), kerf width, MRR and SR. Now, in Figure 13, the end user preselects arc voltage, cutting current, feed rate and torch stand-off distance as the available PAM process parameters, and chamfer, dross, kerf width and SR as the desired responses.…”
Section: Example 3: Plasma Arc Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the product designed with this goal will deliver more consistent performance regardless of the environment in which it is used. Yang et al (2001), Bini et al (2008), Radovanovic et al (2011), Mis et al (2011), Bhuvenesh et al (2012, Salonitis et al (2012), Das et al (2014), Prajapati (2015 and Kechagias et al (2017) are conducted this technique to their study.…”
Section: Mrr= (Weight Diff/density)/cutting Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yamaguchi et al [9] performed a physical investigation on the magnetic arc blow during plasma machining operations and proposed a magnetic shielding cap by experimenting on various nozzles materials. Milan et al [10] investigated PAC of EN 31 steel and showed that gas pressure has the major influence on the MRR characteristics. Siva Ramakrishna et al [11] used formulae for the calculation of MRR and validated with adequacy test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%