2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1822-1_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Process Parameters of Abrasive Water Jet Machining Using Variations of Cohort Intelligence (CI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For exploiting capabilities and potentials of AWJM process to the maximum extent, optimization is unavoidable. Gulia and Nargundkar (2019) have applied cohort intelligence (CI, a socio-inspired algorithm adopting the concepts of artificial intelligence) to identify the optimal AWJM process parameters for the output responses (namely, surface roughness (Ra) and kerf ). Their studies indicate better performance of CI when compared to that of firefly algorithm (FA).…”
Section: Algorithms Adopted For Optimization Of Awjm Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For exploiting capabilities and potentials of AWJM process to the maximum extent, optimization is unavoidable. Gulia and Nargundkar (2019) have applied cohort intelligence (CI, a socio-inspired algorithm adopting the concepts of artificial intelligence) to identify the optimal AWJM process parameters for the output responses (namely, surface roughness (Ra) and kerf ). Their studies indicate better performance of CI when compared to that of firefly algorithm (FA).…”
Section: Algorithms Adopted For Optimization Of Awjm Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018) employed the Taguchi-DEAR (data envelopment analysis-based ranking) methodology to study the impact of process parameters on the machining of Al7075 composites reinforced with TiB2 particles during abrasive water jet machining (AWJM). Various other AWJM processes have identified optimal parameters using algorithms such as cohort intelligence (CI) (Gulia and Nargundkar, 2019), multi-objective cuckoo search (MOCS) (Qiang et al ., 2018), artificial bee colony (ABC) (Pawar et al ., 2018), Jay algorithm (Venkata Rao, 2019), multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis (MOORA) (Kalirasu et al ., 2017), Gray wolf optimizer (GWO) (Chakraborty and Mitra, 2018), gravitational search algorithm (GSA) (Mokkandi et al ., 2017), response surface methodology (RSM) (Ma et al ., 2020), artificial neural network (ANN) (Gong et al ., 2022; Sing et al ., 2021), as well as Taguchi method and evolutionary optimization (Shukla and Singh, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static and dynamic penalty function approach is incorporated in CI (CI-SPF and CI-DPF) for solving several test problems and manufacturing engineering problems [23]. The multi-CI [24] and variations of CI [25] were used to solve the AWJM problem for minimization of surface roughness. The CI-SPF is adopted for solving complex problems from truss structure and mechanical engineering domain [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%