2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03688-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of process parameters using graphene-based dielectric in electric discharge machining of AISI D2 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the results of ANOVA for SR. A 95% confidence level or a significance criterion of 5% (α = 0.05) were used to evaluate the predictions. 5 Table 1 shows that the R-sq (adj) and R-sq data are 92.56% and 95.35%, respectively, confirming the regression model's ability to provide rigorous investigation of the factors for SR. Current intensity (0.004), discharge time (0.023) and HA amount (0.033) are statistically significant for SR, with p values less than 0.05 according to the previous studies. 5,10,17,18,41 A , B , and C each contribute 56.68%, 19.82%, and 15.75%, respectively to SR. To conclude, addition of HAp to the working fluid along with the discharge time and current intensity affected SR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 shows the results of ANOVA for SR. A 95% confidence level or a significance criterion of 5% (α = 0.05) were used to evaluate the predictions. 5 Table 1 shows that the R-sq (adj) and R-sq data are 92.56% and 95.35%, respectively, confirming the regression model's ability to provide rigorous investigation of the factors for SR. Current intensity (0.004), discharge time (0.023) and HA amount (0.033) are statistically significant for SR, with p values less than 0.05 according to the previous studies. 5,10,17,18,41 A , B , and C each contribute 56.68%, 19.82%, and 15.75%, respectively to SR. To conclude, addition of HAp to the working fluid along with the discharge time and current intensity affected SR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Consequently, a separate coating procedure is necessary, raising the overall cost of the product. 4,5…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through literature review, it was observed that experiments were designed using different statistical and mathematical models by varying process parameters like pulse on time, pulse off time, peak current, gap voltage, spark gap, polarity or duty factor. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] These process parameters influenced the performance parameter, primarily Material Removal Rate, Tool Wear Rate, Surface Roughness, Overcut and Electrode Wear Rate, to name a few. [22][23][24][25][26] Machining mechanism of EDM and its working EDM is a derivative of spark machining and is characterized by its non-contact machining process.…”
Section: Essential Parameters In Electric Discharge Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was because the increase in current increased the heat transferred to the work surface, resulting in an improved material removal by the removal of debris of a larger size. Hence, it created large-sized craters on the work surface that rose the surface roughness [35].…”
Section: Effect Of Peak Current On the R A Mrr And Twrmentioning
confidence: 99%