1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199908)42:2<408::aid-mrm24>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of realtime adaptive navigator correction for 3D magnetic resonance coronary angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each direction of motion, correction factors were determined as the slope of the displacements measured in: 1) the free-breathing datasets; 2) the multiple breath-hold data-sets; and 3) the multiple LED-guided breath-hold data-sets, which covered a reduced respiratory range. In addition, the data-sets for small inspiratory and expiratory breath-holds were also used to calculate the correction factors by a simple twopoint technique (7,8). For each direction of motion, a nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if there were significant differences between the correction factors measured by each of the four techniques.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each direction of motion, correction factors were determined as the slope of the displacements measured in: 1) the free-breathing datasets; 2) the multiple breath-hold data-sets; and 3) the multiple LED-guided breath-hold data-sets, which covered a reduced respiratory range. In addition, the data-sets for small inspiratory and expiratory breath-holds were also used to calculate the correction factors by a simple twopoint technique (7,8). For each direction of motion, a nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if there were significant differences between the correction factors measured by each of the four techniques.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to a failure of the linear model, or to inaccuracies in the motion correction factors, the effects of which would become greater as the range of motion requiring correction increases. It is clear from the large standard deviation of the SI correction factors measured in the original study (4) that there is considerable variability between subjects, and this has led other groups to implement subject-specific values (7,8). However, such implementations have still assumed that AP motion is relatively small and fixed, and that there is no left-right (LR) motion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correction was performed by shifting the craniocaudal imaging position by 30% of the actual diaphragmatic offset. 4 …”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the acquisition of 3D-MR images was shown to be largely operator independent and quite reproducible and may serve as an alternative in interventional MRI application for the assessment of cardiovascular structures. 18,36 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%