2003
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2003.814322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of scannable latches for low energy

Abstract: Abstract-This paper covers a range of issues in the design of latches and flip-flops for low-power applications. First it revisits, extends, and improves the energy-performance optimization methodology, attempting to make it more formal and comprehensive. The data-switching factor and the glitching activity are taken into consideration, using a formal analytical approach, then a notion of an energy-efficient family of configurations is introduced to make the comparison of different latch styles in the energy-p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the optimum break-up conditions are unknown in advance, we propose to extend this work to address the most important question in the design of the clocked storage elements: given the application and the set of candidate storage elements, what is the best choice of the CSE topology and what is its optimal design point in terms of transistor sizing? In subsequent works, Zyuban [7] proposes comparing the CSEs based on energy efficient characteristics with fixed input size and output load which is a significant improvement versus metric-based comparisons. However, this work does not capture the effect of the loading conditions on the CSE comparison which is necessary for determining the Energy and Delay break-up between CSEs and logic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the optimum break-up conditions are unknown in advance, we propose to extend this work to address the most important question in the design of the clocked storage elements: given the application and the set of candidate storage elements, what is the best choice of the CSE topology and what is its optimal design point in terms of transistor sizing? In subsequent works, Zyuban [7] proposes comparing the CSEs based on energy efficient characteristics with fixed input size and output load which is a significant improvement versus metric-based comparisons. However, this work does not capture the effect of the loading conditions on the CSE comparison which is necessary for determining the Energy and Delay break-up between CSEs and logic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents a comparison and analysis of the CSEs based on their energy-delay characteristics and a particular application. The notion of CSE performance is extended by using the composite energy-delay characteristics over an entire collection of CSEs [7] and by formulating the natural target application of each individual CSE. A quantitative method for optimal cycle time break-up is defined on the system level and based on practical environment and system parameters constraints, that is, the combined effect of the varying delay target for the CSE and varying CSE load due to the changing operating point of the logic block with the target cycle time must be accounted for to achieve a meaningful quantitative analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [153,157,158], the value j=i (g) is named "hardware intensity". Basically, j=i (g) quantifies the effort to be spent in sizing a circuit to optimize the speed of the circuit at the expense of its energy consumption.…”
Section: Energy-delay Metrics and Hardware Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-threshold systems are typically used for nontiming critical applications aiming an operation at the minimum energy point, thus the voltage where further reduction in supply voltage would result in an increase in energy per operation due to an increased leakage component [7]. As opposed to most other circuit optimization approaches [10,2] here the optimization goal in transistor sizing thus only is an energy and no energy-delay-product optimization. Considering only active energy, the optimum therefore obviously is the configuration where all transistors have minimum width.…”
Section: Transistor Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%