2017
DOI: 10.1108/hff-07-2015-0284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the blowing ratio for film cooling on a flat plate

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report the result of a numerical investigation of film cooling performance on a flat plate for finding optimum blowing ratios. Design/methodology/approach Steady-state simulations have been performed, and the flow has been considered incompressible. Calculations have been performed with 3D finite-volume method and the k-e turbulence model. Findings The adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and the effects of density ratio (DR), blowing ratio (M) and main stream turbul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the numerical results of round and trenched film-cooling holes, referring Cases 1 and 2, are applied versus the experimental results, conducted by Schmidt (Baldauf et al, 2002) and Lu (Lu et al, 2009), respectively, at the corresponding boundary conditions. k-« models have been proved to have the ability of predicting downstream cooling effectiveness, including standard (An and Liu, 2017;Oguntade et al, 2010;Kelishami and Lakzian, 2017;Zhang and Hassan, 2006), RNG (Bayraktar and Yilmaz, 2011) and realizable k-« model (Oguntade et al, 2013). Besides, Zhang and Hassan (2006) proved that the standard k-« model outperforms k-v , Reynolds-Stress and Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model.…”
Section: Computational Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the numerical results of round and trenched film-cooling holes, referring Cases 1 and 2, are applied versus the experimental results, conducted by Schmidt (Baldauf et al, 2002) and Lu (Lu et al, 2009), respectively, at the corresponding boundary conditions. k-« models have been proved to have the ability of predicting downstream cooling effectiveness, including standard (An and Liu, 2017;Oguntade et al, 2010;Kelishami and Lakzian, 2017;Zhang and Hassan, 2006), RNG (Bayraktar and Yilmaz, 2011) and realizable k-« model (Oguntade et al, 2013). Besides, Zhang and Hassan (2006) proved that the standard k-« model outperforms k-v , Reynolds-Stress and Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model.…”
Section: Computational Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most effective utilization of a scenario or available circumstances/resources is a stitch in time, considering the current energy situation. Many studies are presented and are under consideration dealing with the optimization of diverse scenarios, from all walks of life [47][48][49][50]. The current study may form a base for comparative efficiency analysis of AC and DC distribution systems with the DC system incorporating the suggested scheme of modular architecture.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to suppress the generation of CVP and weaken the associated undesirable effects, many kinds of active and passive control [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] have been proposed. Among the active control methods, the key parameters mainly include jet flow frequency [8,9], intensity of freestream turbulence [10,11], density ratio [11,12], and blowing ratio [13]. As for passive control, geometrical shape of film cooling hole [14][15][16] and geometrical parameters of upstream obstacle [17,18] receive lots of attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%