2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2012.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the design and performance of hydrocyclones by Differential Evolution technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(1), was the model that best fits to the experimental data, with a linear correlation coefficient (R) equal to 0.9927, whose parameters d 63. 2 1) and n were 12.15 μm and 0.73 respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1), was the model that best fits to the experimental data, with a linear correlation coefficient (R) equal to 0.9927, whose parameters d 63. 2 1) and n were 12.15 μm and 0.73 respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Hydrocyclones perform solid-liquid or liquid-liquid separation using a centrifugal sedimentation as a basic principle of separation [2]. In contrast to centrifugation which uses the same principle of separation, hydrocyclones have no moving parts, thus reducing the costs of acquisition, maintenance, and operation because they are considered as simple and easy constructions [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vieira et al (2011) studying the effect of geometric parameters on the performance of SLHC by CFD and RSM, found a better design leading to Euler number and cut size in minimum levels. Silva et al (2012) used the differential evolution algorithm to improve the performance of SLHC. The optimized configuration of hydrocyclone presented a high efficiency and a small reduced cut size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental variables include the operation parameters and structure parameters of the hydrocyclone with feed solid, inlet pressure, diameter of the apex, and diameter of the vortex. Simultaneously, the method can be also used to arrange the experiment combined with the other technology in optimization [17]. Clearly, the experimental design method has good effectiveness to the optimization for the small number of tests and lesser test time and costs; however, due to the large amount of the impact factors, especially the structure factors involved in the hydrocyclone, only a few key factors can be selected and be optimized, and, also due to the amount of experimental works and because it costs too much, the DOE method is restricted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%