2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography using contrast-detail metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to probe the image quality with respect to dose, we utilize so called FOM parameter. 24,25 We replaced the radiation dose quantities used in these publications by DAP, as in…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to probe the image quality with respect to dose, we utilize so called FOM parameter. 24,25 We replaced the radiation dose quantities used in these publications by DAP, as in…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IQF inv and DAP values were determined for all PMMA slab thicknesses and air gap distances. In order to probe the image quality with respect to dose, we utilize so called FOM parameter 24,25 . We replaced the radiation dose quantities used in these publications by DAP, as inFOM=IQFinv2DAP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly favours the detectability of lesions such as lung cancers in CXR. [42,43]. To the best of our knowledge, our proposed and utilised method for evaluation and comparing the imaging systems performance, within and between hospitals, based on a FOM concept that has not been used before.…”
Section: Image Quality Versus Radiation Dose/ Fommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former applies to the raw images, while the latter is based on clinical images presented to radiologists. The images presented to clinicians are derived from the raw images by employing nonlinear processing algorithms to enhance the low contrast between breast tissue and pathological findings [6]. While CDMAM phantoms may not be suitable to detect an impact of these processing algorithms (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%