2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the inspection intervals of a safety system in a nuclear power plant by Multi-Objective Differential Evolution (MODE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both JADE and μJADE feature a binomial crossover method, which is the standard method for DE, and allows for any combination of mutated and non-mutated components. Alternatives include the exponential crossover method, which crosses over a number of consecutive components, but this is generally inferior to binomial crossover (Zio and Viadana, 2011).…”
Section: Jade Mojade and Moμjadementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both JADE and μJADE feature a binomial crossover method, which is the standard method for DE, and allows for any combination of mutated and non-mutated components. Alternatives include the exponential crossover method, which crosses over a number of consecutive components, but this is generally inferior to binomial crossover (Zio and Viadana, 2011).…”
Section: Jade Mojade and Moμjadementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, greedy algorithms typically have a higher risk of losing diversity in the population. Without diversity the algorithm can prematurely converge on a solution which is a local optimum, rather than a global optimum, simply because it is unaware other possibilities exist (Zio and Viadana, 2011). DE algorithms have previously been successfully applied to nuclear reactor core design optimization problems (Sacco et al, 2009); however, they do not yet appear to have been applied to nuclear fuel assembly design optimization problems, thus making this investigation both novel and a useful step in examining DE's applicability to solving such problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DE is a population-based algorithm similar to GA, but with more perturbations in the iterations of the population [11]- [13].…”
Section: B Differential Evolution (De)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When tackling a multi‐objective problem by GA, the various approaches to fitness definition may be distinguished into three categories [29], namely aggregation method, population‐based non‐Pareto method and Pareto‐based method. In Pareto‐based method, the chromosomes of a population are ranked according to the Pareto dominance criterion applied to the fitnesses.…”
Section: Moec Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three efficient versions of DE for multi‐objective optimisation problems were proposed by Babu et al . [29, 34]. Two of these versions work with an archive approach, but avoid the ranking procedure, while the third one, called MODE‐3, inherits the strength of the selection process scheme for single‐objective optimisation.…”
Section: Moec Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%