2018
DOI: 10.1585/pfr.13.3402118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the Magnetic Sensor Configuration for JT-60SA Plasma Control

Abstract: The number of magnetic probes and flux loops required for a sufficiently accurate plasma surface reconstruction of JT-60SA are investigated by applying the Cauchy condition surface (CCS) method. For this purpose, CCS reconstruction parameters, CCS size and the number of CCS nodes, were optimized using the various combinations of limited number of magnetic sensors. The highly accurate reconstruction within the 1 cm divertor-hit-point error in the JT-60SA plasma can be obtained by optimizing the CCS reconstructi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we assume Gaussian noises as a disturbance of the magnetic diagnostics. The maximum noise for the magnetic field diagnostics is 1 G and that for the flux loop diagnostics is 0.5 mWb [15], respectively, which is empirically determined from the JT-60U experiment and will be validated through the JT-60SA integrated commissioning. In the simulation, we applied the Gaussian noises at each control time-step (250 µs) with a variance σ = 1/3 G for the magnetic field, and 1/6 mWb for the magnetic flux.…”
Section: Resilience To Noises In Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, we assume Gaussian noises as a disturbance of the magnetic diagnostics. The maximum noise for the magnetic field diagnostics is 1 G and that for the flux loop diagnostics is 0.5 mWb [15], respectively, which is empirically determined from the JT-60U experiment and will be validated through the JT-60SA integrated commissioning. In the simulation, we applied the Gaussian noises at each control time-step (250 µs) with a variance σ = 1/3 G for the magnetic field, and 1/6 mWb for the magnetic flux.…”
Section: Resilience To Noises In Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, we assume Gaussian noises as a disturbance of the magnetic diagnostics. The maximum noise for the magnetic field diagnostics is 1 G and that for the flux loop diagnostics is 0.5 mWb [18], respectively, which is empirically determined from the JT-60U experiment and will be validated through the JT-60SA integrated commissioning. In the simulation, we applied the Gaussian noises at each control time-step (250 μs) with a variance σ = 1/3 G for the magnetic field, and 1/6 mWb for the magnetic flux.…”
Section: Typical Scenarios For VI Classificationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Here we assume Gaussian noises as a disturbance of the magnetic diagnostics. The maximum noise for the magnetic field diagnostics is 1 G and that for the flux loop diagnostics is 0.5 mWb [18], respectively, which is empirically determined from the JT-60U experiment and will be validated through the JT-60SA integrated commissioning. In the simulation, we applied the Gaussian noises at each control time-step (250 μs) with a variance σ = 1/3 G for the magnetic field, and 1/6 mWb for the magnetic flux.…”
Section: Simulation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%