2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the methanol oxidation over iron–molybdate catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. Our experience has shown that the pure copper oxide has a low activity toward the oxidation of DME [20], which is confirmed by the results in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6. Our experience has shown that the pure copper oxide has a low activity toward the oxidation of DME [20], which is confirmed by the results in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…4. The activity of the mixed catalyst significantly exceeds that of the pure CuO under the same conditions of conducting the CO oxidation [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned previously, the constraints of process safety which require the operation of this highly exothermic process in multitubular reactors below the explosion limit of the air–methanol mixture lead to low‐specific productivity and restrict the production capacity . Gribovskii et al have stated that the technological constraints of the kinetic characteristics of the Fe‐Mo process have not allowed improvement in intensification despite efforts in increasing catalyst activity, increasing inlet methanol concentration, increasing mixture heat capacity, and changing reactor configuration . The low production rate also implies a low gas flow rate which negatively impacts the heat and mass transfer rates in the bed and encourages nonuniformity of temperature and concentration .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Gribovskii et al have stated that the technological constraints of the kinetic characteristics of the Fe-Mo process have not allowed improvement in intensification 23 despite efforts in increasing catalyst activity, 25 increasing inlet methanol concentration, 24 increasing mixture heat capacity, 26 and changing reactor configuration. 27 The low production rate also implies a low gas flow rate which negatively impacts the heat and mass transfer rates in the bed and encourages nonuniformity of temperature and concentration. 24 On the other hand, Andersson et al 3 have enumerated process-related factors which have led to increases in productivity, such as gas recirculation, the use of pre-calcined catalyst rings to replace granules and obtain lower pressure drop and higher flow rates, pressurization and in the FORMOX process the development of refined catalyst activity profiles, which improve the reaction rate and temperature profile along the reactor tube by introducing several layers of catalyst particles along the tube (e.g., inert particles, mixed particles).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%