2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2020.2982625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Two-Way Network Coded HARQ With Overhead

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the authors of Ref. [39] optimized the technique of hybrid automatic repeat requests for packet control overhead. However, these works ignore the possibility of controlling packet header length for control overhead.…”
Section: Control Overhead Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the authors of Ref. [39] optimized the technique of hybrid automatic repeat requests for packet control overhead. However, these works ignore the possibility of controlling packet header length for control overhead.…”
Section: Control Overhead Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we assume that users can report the specific codewords that they succeeded in decoding. In this case, the BS can leverage that information and use network coding schemes to optimize the IR [35,36,50,51]. Since not all users are interested in all codewords, extension IR bits for any given codeword would only benefit a subset of the users, possibly a single one.…”
Section: Decision Engine For Multi-user Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea, commonly known as network coded (H)ARQ, dates back to the 1980s [33], but it has recently experienced a renewed interest from the research community due to its potential uses in the Internet of Things (IoT). Its maximal achievable throughput under idealized conditions was characterized in [34], and [35] extended that work with a deeper study of the practical overheads associated with various implementations. It showed that using general linear codes requires significantly more overhead than binary codes, since the transmitter not only needs to specify which packets are included in each linear combination, but also their coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%