2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5066796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of warpage on plastic part by using response surface methodology (RSM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most conventional strategy is to reduce the warpage by optimising the process parameters, the idea being that process parameters impact the magnitude of the warpage and the shape of the warped part. The literature [4,6,11,14,15,29] identifies the following parameters as the most influential: melt temperature, injection and cooling time, and injection packing pressure. Changing the value of these process parameters causes a change in the material state during the moulding process, e.g., temperature and pressure field distribution in the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most conventional strategy is to reduce the warpage by optimising the process parameters, the idea being that process parameters impact the magnitude of the warpage and the shape of the warped part. The literature [4,6,11,14,15,29] identifies the following parameters as the most influential: melt temperature, injection and cooling time, and injection packing pressure. Changing the value of these process parameters causes a change in the material state during the moulding process, e.g., temperature and pressure field distribution in the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategies used to determine the optimal combination of the process parameters employ different optimisation methods, e.g. Response Surface Method [11], Dual Response Surface Method [5], Glowworm Swarm Optimisation [28], the Kriging model [9,10], genetic algorithms [29] and others [4]. Most of them succeed in reducing warpage by up to 50%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two combinations of factors are statistically significant on warpage: melt temperature and packing time and packing pressure and packing time. Hidayah et al [13] used response surface methodology combined the AMI software as the optimization approach in order to obtain the initial setting of process parameters in injection molding that may lead to the minimization of warpage. From ANOVA result, melt temperature is the most significant factor that give influenced to the formation of warpage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%